Типы разногласия в политическом онлайн-разговоре на примере анализа американских обсуждений второго импичмента Д. Трампа в социальных сетях
Аннотация
В данной работе автор анализирует разногласия между участниками политических онлайн-дискуссий и их типов на примере обсуждений о втором импичменте Д. Трампа в социальной сети Facebook . Для этого используется контент-анализ (Neuendorf, 2002), позволяющий исследовать позиции граждан, их интерактивность, разногласие, его типы в категориях аргументации и (не)цивилизованности. Эмпирический материал представлен четырьмя онлайн-обсуждениями четырёх американских СМИ, разделенных по политической принадлежности к партии: либеральные и консервативные. Статья вносит эмпирический и методологический вклад в делиберативные исследования и требует переосмысления делиберативной теории Ю. Хабермаса, обращая внимание на практическое содержание делиберации и проблему несогласия в политической дискуссии. В работе делаются выводы о том, что 1) разногласия в американских онлайн-дискуссиях на примере второго импичмента Д. Трампа есть, но их число невелико; 2) их можно охарактеризовать преимущественно как цивилизованные и обоснованные, чем нецивилизованные и необоснованные; 3) общий консенсус по обсуждаемой проблеме гражданами не достигается.
БЛАГОДАРНОСТЬ
Работа выполнена при поддержке грантов РНФ: проект №21-18-00454 «Медиатизированная коммуникация и современный делиберативный процесс» https://www.rscf.ru/project/21-18-00454/ и проект №22-18-00364 «Институциональная трансформация управления электронным участием в России: исследование региональной специфики» https://rscf.ru/project/22-18-00364/ Теоретическая часть выполнена в рамках проекта №21-18-00454, эмпирическая – в рамках проекта №22-18-00364. Отдельную благодарность выражаю научному руководителю моего диссертационного исследования Н. Ю. Савину.
Скачивания
Литература
Ахременко, А. С., Петров, А. П., Стукал, Д. К., Жеглов, С. А., и Хавроненко, М. В. (2021). На что способны боты? Модель протестной и контрпротестной политической мобилизации. Полития: Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз, 102(3), 172–194.
Линде, А. Н. (2022). Концепция делиберативной демократии Ю. Хабермаса: значение для теории демократии и теории политической коммуникации. Аспект Пресс.
Российский государственный гуманитарный университет. (2011). «Делиберация» как метод борьбы с политическим экстремизмом. Российско-швейцарский учебно-научный центр РГГУ.
Словарь русского языка XVIII в. (1991). Делиберация. ФЭБ Русская литература и фольклор. http://feb-web.ru/feb/sl18/slov-abc/05/sl608407.htm
Стукал, Д. К., Ахременко, А. С., и Петров, А. П. (2022). Аффективная политическая поляризация и язык ненависти: созданы друг для друга? Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология, 24(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-3-480-498
Bennett, S. E., Flickinger, R. S., & Rhine, S. L. (2000). Political talk over here, over there, over time. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400000053
Bodrunova, S. S. (2021). Social Media and Political Dissent in Russia and Belarus: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Social Media + Society, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211063470
Bodrunova, S. S., & Blekanov, I. S. (2021). A Self-Critical Public: Cumulation of Opinion on Belarusian Oppositional YouTube before the 2020 Protests. Social Media + Society, 7(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211063464
Bodrunova, S., Litvinenko, A., Blekanov, I., & Nepiyushchikh, D. (2021). Constructive aggression? Multiple roles of aggressive content in political discourse on Russian YouTube. Media and Communication, 9(1), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3469
Bohman, J. (2006). Deliberative democracy and the epistemic benefits of diversity. Episteme, 3(3), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.3.175
Bohman, J. (2007). Political communication and the epistemic value of diversity: Deliberation and legitimation in media societies. Communication Theory, 17(4), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00301.x
Campbell, D. (2013). Social Networks and Political Participation. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-033011-201728
Chambers, S. (1996). Reasonable Democracy. Cornell University Press.
Coleman, S., & Blumer, J. (2009). The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy (Communication, Society and Politics). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818271
Conover, P. J., Searing, D. D., & Crewe, I. (2001). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 21–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000029
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press.
Dubois, E. & Szwarc, J. (2018). Self-censorship, Polarization, and the ‘Spiral of Silence’ on Social Media. In Margetts H. et al (Eds.), Internet, Policy and Politics Conference 2018. University of Oxford.
Esterling, K. M., Fung, A., & Lee, T. (2015). How much disagreement is good for democratic deliberation? Political Communication, 32(4), 529–551. http://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.969466
Eveland, W. P. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21, 177–193. http://doi.org/10.1080/10584600490443877
Filatova, O., & Volkovskii, D. (2021). Online Deliberation on Social Media as a Form of Public Dialogue in Russia. In R. Bolgov et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference "Internet and Modern Society" (pp. 146–156). St. Petersburg, Russia. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3090/paper13.pdf
Fischer, K., Reedy, J., Piercy, C. & Thapaliya, R. (2021). A Typology of Reasoning in Deliberative Processes: A Study of the 2010 Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 18(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.951
Fitsilis, P. (2022). Building on Smart Cities Skills and Competences. Human factors affecting smart cities development. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97818-1
Friess, D. (2015). Online Deliberation Complete. Towards a new framework to analyze and explain deliberation online. Conference Paper. 65th ICA Annual Conference, Section for Political Communication. San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Goodwin, M. H. (1983). Aggravated correction and disagreement in children’s conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 657–677.
Graham, T. (2015). Everyday political talk in the Internet-based public sphere. In S. Coleman, & D. Freelon (Eds.). Handbook of Digital Politics (pp. 247–263). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1999). Democracy and disagreement. Why moral conflict cannot be avoided in politics and what should be done about it. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon.
Halpern, D., & Gibbs, J. (2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008
Heatherly, K. A., Lu, Y., & Lee, J. K. (2017). Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1271–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634677
Hong, Y., & Rojas, H. (2016). Agreeing Not to Disagree: Iterative versus Episodic Forms of Political Participatory Behaviors. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1743–1763.
Hyun, K. D. (2018). The Role of Political Agreement and Disagreement of News and Political Discussion on Social Media for Political Participation. Analyses & Alternatives, 2(2), 31–66.
Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617102
Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16, 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198541
Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A. E., & McClurg, S. D. (2012). Disagreeing about Disagreement: How Conflict in Social Networks Affects Political Behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x
Lee, H., Kwak, N., & Campbell, S. W. (2015). Hearing the Other Side Revisited: The Joint Workings of Cross-Cutting Discussion and Strong Tie Homogeneity in Facilitating Deliberative and Participatory Democracy. Communication Research, 42(4), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213483824
Lu, Y., Heatherly, K. A., Lee, J. K. (2016). Cross-cutting exposure on social networking sites: The effects of SNS discussion disagreement on political participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.030
Maia, R. C., Hauber, G., Choucair, T., & Crepalde, N. J. (2021). What Kind of Disagreement Favors Reason-Giving? Analyzing Online Political Discussions across the Broader Public Sphere. Political Studies, 69(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719894708
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In S. Macedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement (pp. 211–239). Oxford University Press.
McClurg, S. D. (2003). Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600407
Merriam-Webster. (n. d.). Deliberation. https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/deliberation
Monnoyer-Smith, L. (2006). Citizen’s deliberation on the Internet: An exploratory study. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(3), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2006070103
Mutz, D. (2002). The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088437
Mutz, D. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617201
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook (1st ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Parkinson, J., & Mansbridge, J. (2012). Deliberative Systems. Cambridge University Press.
Price, V., & Capella, J. N. (2002). Online deliberation and its influence: The electronic dialogue project in campaign 2000. IT & Society, 1(1), 303–329.
Rossini, P., & Maia, R. C. M. (2020). Characterizing Disagreement in Online Political Talk: Examining Incivility and Opinion Expression on News Websites and Facebook in Brazil. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 17(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.16997/10.16997/jdd.967
Savin, N. (2019). Does Media Matter? Variation of VK and Facebook Deliberative Capacities (evidence from Discussions on the Crimea Crisis). Communications. Media. Design, 4(3), 119–139.
Schulz, W. (1997). Changes of Mass Media And The Public Sphere. The Public, 4(2), 57–69.
Steiner, J. (2012). The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy. Empirical Research and Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Steiner, J., Jaramillo, M., Maia, R., & Mameli, S. (2017). Deliberation across Deeply Divided Societies: Transformative Moments. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941591
Strickler, R. (2018). Deliberate with the Enemy? Polarization, Social Identity, and Attitudes toward Disagreement. Political Research Quarterly, 71(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917721371
Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring deliberation’s content: A coding scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.50
Stromer-Galley, J., Bryant, L., & Bimber, B. (2015). Context and medium matter: Expressing disagreements online and face-to-face in political deliberations. Journal of Public Deliberation, 11(1), 1–22. http://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.218
Stukal, D., & Philippov, I. (2022). Promoting a Leader or a Cause? An Agent-Based Model of Social Media Bots. Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mneniya: Ekonomichekie i Sotsial'nye Peremeny, (1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2022.1.2022
Volkovskii, D. (2021). Experience of Applied Research in Online Deliberation: An Analysis of Civility in American Online Discussions. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Proceedings of the International Conference "Internet and Modern Society" (IMS-2021) (pp. 199–205). St. Petersburg, Russia.
Volkovskii, D., & Filatova, O. (2022). Influence of Media Type on Political E-Discourse: Analysis of Russian and American Discussions on Social Media. In A. V. Chugunov, M. Janssen, I. Khodachek, Y. Misnikov, D. Trutnev (Eds.), Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1529, 119–131. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04238-6_10
Warren, M. E. (2009). Governance‐Driven Democratization. Critical Policy Studies, 3(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460170903158040
Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns and expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12199
Wessler, H. (2018). Habermas and the Media. Theory and the Media. Polity.
Wojcieszak, M., & Mutz, D. (2009). Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x
Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2010). Bridging the divide or intensifying the conflict? How disagreement affects strong predilections about sexual minorities. Political Psychology, 31(3), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00753.x
Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2012). Perceived versus Actual Disagreement: Which Influences Deliberative Experiences? Journal of Communication, 62(3), 418–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1460-2466.2012.01645.X
