Defining the Status of Document in the Work of Deimantas Narkevičius "The Role of His Life"

Keywords: document in contemporary art, representation of history, Deimantas Narkevicus, documentary, contemporary art

Abstract

Nowadays we can observe a change in attitude towards a document that is no longer a given, an imprint that contains the facts of history, regardless of external contexts. Now, for those who work with a document, it becomes important how to look at it, how to work with it from the present moment of time. The French philosopher Michel Foucault proposes the understanding of a document as an organized structure in a certain way, asserting that “a document is no longer an immovable matter for history,” which stores irrefutable information about the past. History and document switch places, and the first one becomes a tool "with the help of which the entire body of documents acquires its proper status" and not vice versa. This process enables not only historians but also artists to discover a new type of materials, such as diaries, oral stories, letters and archival photographs. Artists change the context of the existence of materials, thereby revealing the ways of their functioning and the mechanisms of granting documentary status. One of the most interesting artists exploring the issues of history representation is the Lithuanian artist Deimantas Narkevičius. The article considers his work "The role of a lifetime", which is based on an interview, taken by the artist himself with documentary filmmaker Peter Watkins, about the essence of documentary cinematography, the director's profession and its connection with personal subjective experience. Watkins' story is juxtaposed with the chronicle of Brighton in the 1960s and drawings of the sculptural Grutas Park in the city of Druskininkai. The text will consider the issue of what makes it possible to speak of these materials as documents, as well as how the optics of documentary is built in the work of Narkevičius.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tatiana Yurievna Mironova, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Student of the Doctoral Programme “Fine and decorative arts and architecture”

References

Ассман, А. (2016). Новое недовольство мемориальной культурой. Новое литературное обозрение.

Арлаускайте, Н. (2020). Стык и зазор: домашняя фотография и политика голоса в современном литовском документальном кино о советском. Новое литературное обозрение.

Зарецкий, Ю. (2012). Документ для историка: источник, свидетельство, текст. https://www.hse.ru/data/2012/02/11/1263500867/Document_Zaretsky.pdf

Толстой, Л. (1938). Полное собрание сочинений. Том 13. Война и мир. Черновые редакции и варианты. Художественная литература.

Февр, Л. (1991). Бои за историю. Наука.

Фуко, М. (1996). Археология знания. Ника-Центр.

Фуко, М. (1996). Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. Касталь.

Хирш, М. (2016). Что такое постпамять. https://urokiistorii.ru/articles/chto-takoe-postpamjat

Alberro, A. (2003). Conceptual Art and Politics of Publicity. Cambrige: MIT Press.

Berger, B., & Santone, J. (2016). Documentation as Art Practice in the 1960s. Visual Resources. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2016.1241030

Buden, B. (2015). Disappearance of a tribe. In M. Scotini, Deimantas Narkevičius. De Capo. Fifteen films (pp. 139-143). Archive Books.

Enwezor, O. (2008). Archive Fever: Uses of the Document in Contemporary Art. International center of photography.

Esche, Ch. (2015). Energy Lithuania. In M. Scotini, Deimantas Narkevičius. De Capo. Fifteen films (pp. 74-81). Archive Books.

Ferraris, M. (2012). Art as Document. Wittgenstein and Aesthetics: Perspectives and Debates, Frankfurt (pp. 183-193). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110330618.183

gb agency. (2019). His story. https://gbagency.fr/artworks/his-story

Gibbons, J. (2007). Contemporary Art and Memory: Images of Recollection and Remembrance. I.B. Tauris. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755604012

Lippard, L. (2001). Six years: The Dematerialization of the Art Object from 1966 to 1972. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340619

LUX. (2016). Disappearance of a tribe. https://lux.org.uk/work/disappearance-of-a-tribe

LUX. (2016). The role of a lifetime. https://lux.org.uk/work/the-role-of-a-lifetime

MACBA. 10 portraits photographiques de Christian Boltanski, 1946-1964. https://www.macba.cat/en/aprendre-investigar/arxiu/10-portraits-photographiques-christian-boltanski-1946-1964

Narkevičius, D. (2006). Once upon in the XX century. Arnolfini.

Nouril, K. (2019). Making Memories, Mediating Histories in the Work of Deimantas Narkevičius. In G. Mardilovich, M. Taroutina, New Narratives of Russian and East European Art: Between Traditions and Revolutions. (193-204). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429028595-13

Potte-Bonneville, M. (2012). Michel Foucault's bodies. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 43(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429028595-13

Scotini, M. (2015). Deimantas Narkevičius. Da Capo. Fifteen Films (pp. 139-143). Archive Books.

White, H.V., (1966). The Burden of History. History and Theory, 5(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504510

Verwoert, J. (2015). The role of a lifetime. In M. Scotini, Deimantas Narkevičius. De Capo. Fifteen films (pp. 97-109). Archive Books.

Published
2022-07-15
How to Cite
MironovaT. Y. (2022). Defining the Status of Document in the Work of Deimantas Narkevičius "The Role of His Life". Communications. Media. Design, 7(2), 67-85. Retrieved from https://cmd-journal.hse.ru/article/view/14629
Section
Scientific Articles