Socio-Communication Hybridity as The Phenomenon of the Contemporary Information Society

  • Dmitry Gennadievich Evstafiev National Research University Higher School of Economics
Keywords: integrated communications, social action, hybrid environment, social context transformation, communication action, social involvement

Abstract

The development of the modern digital integrated communications that possess the significant potential of social intrusiveness forms a new institutional framework of the interaction between the information society and the social action sphere as well as a new type of links between information and social processes. It is relevant to discuss not only new forms but rather new formats of social institutionalization that develop along the lines of the model of socio-communicational hybridity that is a specific form of manifestation of the specific social networks that have been formed under the conditions of the indivisibility of the social and communicational spaces. Socio-communicational hybridity becomes one of the major and quite effective forms of the organization of the contemporary communicational environment and one of the instruments of the involvement of the individuals as well as different social groups in social processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Dmitry Gennadievich Evstafiev, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Candidate of Sciences in Politics, Professor

References

Aruguete, N., & Calvo, E. (2018). Time to Protest: Selective Exposure, Cascading Activation, and Framing in Social Media. Journal of Communication, 68(3), 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy007

Bennett, A. (1999). Subcultures or Neo–Tribes? Rethinking the Relationship between Youth, Style and Musical Taste. Sociology, 33(3), 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038599000371

Borisova, E. G., & Manokhin, I. V. (2016). Fenomen "Bolotnoy ploshchadi" kak svidetel'stvo formirovaniya novogo sotsial'no-politicheskogo tipa v Rossii [The phenomenon of "Bolotnaya Square" as evidence of the formation of a new socio-political type in Russia]. Vestnik MGLU, 3(742), 129–144.

Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication Theory as a Field. Communication Theory, (9), 119–161.

Diamandis, P., & Kotler, S. (2018). Izobiliye: Budushcheye budet luchshe, chem vy dumayete [Abundance: The future will be better than you think]. AST.

Dimans, S. L., & Levicheva, V. F. (2018). Lyudi i normy: instituty VS neformal'nyye praktiki [People and Norms: Institutions VS Informal Practices]. Klyuch-S.

Evstafiev, D. G. (2019). Socio-Communication Hybridity as the Phenomenon of the Contemporary Information Society. Communications. Media. Design, 3(4), 140-158 https://cmd-journal.hse.ru/article/view/9896

Fuchs, Ch. (2017). From Digital Positivism and Administrative Big Data Analytics Towards Critical Digital and Social Media Research! European journal of communications, 32(1), 37–49. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0267323116682804

Gur'yanova, A. S. (2015). Novoyaz internet-sredy: k probleme issledovaniya [Internet Newspeak: Toward a Research Problem]. Filologiya i literaturovedeniye, 48(9). http://philology.snauka.ru/2015/09/1696

Lachmann, R. (2009). Diskursy fantasticheskogo [Discourses of the fantastic]. Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye.

Lilleker, D. (2010). Politicheskaya kommunikatsiya. Klyuchevyye kontsepty [Political communication. Key concepts]. Izdatel'stvo "Gumanitarnyy tsentr".

Luman, N. (2011). Obshchestvo obshchestva. Kn. 1, Obshchestvo kak sotsial'naya sistema [Society of the society. B. 1, Society as a social system]. Logos.

McLuhan, M., & Fiore, K. (2012). Voyna i mir v global'noy derevne [War and Peace in the Global Village]. AST, Astrel'.

Parsons, T. (2018). O strukture sotsial'nogo deystviya [On the structure of social action]. Akademicheskiy proyekt.

Pentland, A. (2018). Sotsial'naya fizika. Kak rasprostranyayutsya khoroshiye idei: uroki novoy nauki [Social physics. How Good Ideas Spread: Lessons from the New Science]. AST.

Ratti, K., & Klodel, M. (2017). Gorod zavtrashnego dnya. Sensory, seti, hakery i budushchee gorodskoj zhizni [The city of tomorrow. Sensors, networks, hackers and the future of urban life]. Izdatel'stvo Instituta Gajdara.

Schwab, K., & Davis, N. (2018). Tekhnologii chetvertoy promyshlennoy revolyutsii [Technologies of the fourth industrial revolution]. EKSMO.

Urry, J. (2012). Mobil'nosti [Mobility] (N. A. Kharlamov, Ed.). Praksis.

Van Dijk, T. (2013). Diskurs i vlast'. Reprezentatsiya v yazyke i kommunikatsii [Discourse and power. Representation in language and communication]. Knizhnyy dom «Librokom».

Yegorchenkov, D. A., & Danyuk, N. S. (2018). Тeoretiko-ideologicheskiye podkhody k issledovaniyu fenomena "gibridnykh voyn" i "gibridnykh ugroz": vzglyad iz Rossii [Theoretical and ideological approaches to the study of the phenomenon of "hybrid wars" and "hybrid threats": a view from Russia] Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Series 12, Politicheskiye nauki, (1), 26–48.

Published
2021-03-31
How to Cite
EvstafievD. G. (2021). Socio-Communication Hybridity as The Phenomenon of the Contemporary Information Society. Communications. Media. Design, 6(1), 22-38. Retrieved from https://cmd-journal.hse.ru/article/view/12200
Section
Scientific Articles