Критика доминирующей позиции и поддержка альтернативных способов восприятия бездомности: формулирование положения бездомного субъекта в греческой уличной газете Shedia
Аннотация
В статье используется теория дискурса для анализа конструирования положения бездомного субъекта в греческой уличной газете Shedia. После краткого обзора основных частей теории дискурса Лакло и Муфф (1985) в статье излагаются теоретические наработки, описывающие элементы, при помощи которых конструируется положение бездомного субъекта, с учетом существования доминирующей позиции, в основе которой лежит стигматизация и другие факторы. Если традиционные средства массовой информации воспроизводят проблемное представление этого явления, то уличные газеты напротив предлагают противоположные доминирующим (более корректные) формулировки положения бездомного субъекта. При анализе освещения этого явления в газете Shedia, было выявлено три основных момента в доминирующем дискурсе о бездомных: стигматизация отсутствия места жительства, отсутствие социального влияния и политической идентичности. Дискурс, противоположный доминирующему, также представлен в Shedia тремя ключевыми моментами: альтернативное место жительства, приписывание социального влияния и политической идентичности. Мы полагаем, что это исследование может считаться актуальным, поскольку оно показывает зеркальные отличия между доминирующими и противоположными им представлениями, а также важность использования теории высокого порядка для углубления нашего понимания социальных практик.
Скачивания
Литература
Benjamin, W. (1999). The arcades project (H. Eiland and K. McLaughlin, Trans.). Cambridge: Belknap (Original work published 1939).
Blumer, Herbert (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Boukhari, S. (1999). ‘The press takes to the street’, Unesco Courier 52: 43–44.
Carpentier, N. (2017). The discursive-material knot: Cyprus in conflict and community media participation. New York: Peter Lang.
Carpentier, N., Doudaki, V. (2019). ‘The construction of the homeless as a discursive-political struggle: A discursive-theoretical re-reading of the homeless subject position’, Filosofija. Sociologija, 30(1): 71–79. https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v30i1.3918
Daly, G. (1996). Homeless: Policies, strategies and lives on the street. London & New York: Routledge.
de Melo Resende, V. (2016). ‘Discursive representation and violation of homeless people’s rights: Symbolic violence in Brazilian online journalism’, Discourse & Communication 10(6): 596–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481316674778
Di Gregorio, M. & Merolli, J. L. (2016). ‘Introduction: Affective citizenship and the politics of identity, control, resistance’, Citizenship Studies 20(8): 933–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2016.1229193
Doudaki, V., Carpentier, N. (2019). ‘The construction of the homeless in the Greek street paper shedia’, pp. 85–103 in M. F. Murru, F. Colombo, L. Peja, S. Tosoni, R. Kilborn, R. Kunelius, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, L. Kramp and N. Carpentier (Eds.) Communication as the intersection of the old and the new. Bremen: edition lumière, in press.
FEANTSA-Foundation Abbé Pierre (2019). ‘Fourth overview of housing exclusion in Europe. March 2019. Brussels-Paris.
https://www.feantsa.org/download/oheeu_2019_eng_web5120646087993915253.pdf
Felski, R. (1999/2000). ‘The invention of everyday life’, New Formations 39: 1531.
Garafola, N. (2000). ‘The word from the curb: Street papers give voice to people locked out of the major media’, Utne Reader (Sept./Oct.). https://www.utne.com/media/the-word-from-the-curb
Hammar, T. (1989). ‘State, nation, and dual citizenship’, pp. 81–95 in R. W. Brubaker (Ed.) Immigration and the politics of citizenship in Europe and North America. Lanham & London: German Marshall Fund of the US.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203873106
Harter, L. M., Edwards, A., McClanahan, A., Hopson, M. C., Carson-Stern, E. (2004). ‘Organizing for survival and social change: The case of street wise’, Communication Studies 55(2): 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388627
Hodgetts, D, Cullen, A., Radley, A. (2005). ‘Television characterizations of homeless people in the United Kingdom’, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 5(1): 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00054.x
Hollows, J. (2008). Domestic cultures. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Howley, K. (2003). ‘A poverty of voices: Street papers as communicative democracy’, Journalism 4(3): 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849030043002
Howley, K. (2005). Community media: People, places, and communication technologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hrast, M. F. (2008). ‘Media representations of homelessness and the link to (effective) policies: The case of Slovenia’, European Journal of Homelessness 2: 115–137.
Hughes-Edwards, M. (2006). ‘“The house […] has cancer”: Representations of domestic space in the poetry of Carol Ann Duffy’, pp. 121–139 in G. Smyth and J. Croft. (Eds.) Our house: The representation of domestic space in modern culture. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.
Laclau, E., Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
Levinson, D. (2004) Encyclopedia of homelessness [2 volumes]. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Maleuvre, D. (1999). Museum memories: History, technology, art. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Marshall, T. H. (1992). ‘Citizenship and social class’, pp. 1–51 in T. H. Marshall and T. B. Bottomore (Eds.) Citizenship and social class. London: Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt18mvns1
McCarthy, L. (2013). ‘Homelessness and identity: A critical review of the literature and theory’, People, Place & Policy Online 7(1): 46–58. https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.0007.0001.0004
McNamara, R. (2008). Homelessness in America [3 volumes]. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
McVeigh, R. (1997). ‘Theorising sedentarism: The roots of anti-nomadism’, pp. 7–25 in T. Acton (Ed.) Gypsy politics and traveller Identity. Hertfordshire: University of Hertfordshire Press.
Mookherjee, M. (2005). ‘Affective citizenship: Feminism, postcolonialism and the politics of recognition’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8(1): 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369823042000335830
Morley, D. (2000). Home territories: Media, mobility and identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
Parsell, C. (2011). ‘Homeless identities: Enacted and ascribed’, The British Journal of Sociology 62(3): 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01373.x
Platt, S. (1999). ‘Home truths. Media representations of homelessness’, pp. 104–117 in B. Franklin (Ed.) Social Policy, the Media and Misrepresentation. London: Routledge.
Powell, R. (2008). ‘Understanding the stigmatization of gypsies: Power and the dialectics of (dis)identification’, Housing, Theory and Society 25(2): 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090701657462
Rosenthal, R. (2000). ‘Imaging homelessness and homeless people: Visions and strategies within the movement(s)’, Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless 9(2): 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009418301674
Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
Schneider, B. (2011). ‘Sourcing homelessness: How journalists use sources to frame homelessness’, Journalism 13(1): 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911421573
Schneider, B., Chamberlain, K., Hodgetts, D. (2010). ‘Representations of homelessness in four Canadian newspapers: Regulation, control, and social order’, The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 37(4): 147–172.
Shedia (2017). Ετήσια Έκθεση 2017 M.K.O (Annual Report 2017 NGO). http://www.shedia.gr/media/uploads/apologismos_2017_c.pdf.
Shields, T. G. (2001). ‘Network news construction of homelessness: 1980–1993’, The Communication Review 4(2): 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420109359468
Smyth, G., Croft, J. (2006). ‘Introduction: Culture and domestic space’, pp. 11–26 in G. Smyth and J. Croft (Eds.) Our house: The representation of domestic space in modern culture. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.
Snow, D., Anderson, L. (1987). ‘Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities’, American Journal of Sociology 92: 1336–1371. https://doi.org/10.1086/228668
Swain, J. (2011). ‘Busting the myth’, Inside Housing. https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/comment/comment/busting-the-myth-29621
Torck, D. (2001). ‘Voices of homeless people in street newspapers: A cross-cultural exploration’, Discourse & Society 12(3): 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003005
Tuchman, G. (1978). ‘Introduction: The symbolic annihilation of women by the mass media’, pp. 3–38 in G. Tuchman, A. K. Daniels and J. Benet (Eds.) Hearth and home: Images of women in the mass media. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62965-7_9
Turner, B. S. (2016). ‘We are all denizens now: On the erosion of citizenship’, Citizenship Studies 20(6–7): 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2016.1191432
United Nations (2019) ‘Access to justice for the right to housing’, Human Rights Council report, March 2019.
http://unhousingrapp.org/user/pages/04.resources/Access%20to%20justice%20Report.pdf
Van Brussel, L. (2018). ‘The right to die: A Belgian case study combining reception studies and discourse theory’, Media, Culture & Society 40(3): 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717718255
Wardhaugh, J. (1999). ‘The unaccommodated woman: Home, homelessness and identity’, Sociological Review 47(1): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717718255
Whang, I., Min, E. (1999a). ‘Discourse analysis of television news on public antagonism against the homeless’, pp. 95–107 in E. Min (Ed.) Reading the homeless: The media’s image of homeless culture. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Whang, I., Min, E. (1999b). ‘Blaming the homeless: The populist aspect of network TV news’, pp. 121–133 in E. Min (Ed.) Reading the homeless: The media’s image of homeless culture. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Zufferey, C. (2014). ‘Questioning representations of homelessness in the Australian print media’, Australian Social Work 67(4): 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407x.2013.842604
