Ethics on AI and Technological Sovereignty

  • Fatima Roumate Mohammed V University, International Institute of Scientific Research
Keywords: technological sovereignty, cyberspace sovereignty, data sovereignty, artificial intelligence

Abstract

This paper addresses the current evolution of some notions and principles such as sovereignty recognized since the Westphalian system to States and which become now competed by big tech. This lead to a new form of dictatorship and tyranny.
New forms of sovereignty as technological, digital, and data sovereignty characterize the artificial intelligence era. In this paper, we will try first to explain the difference between these three forms of sovereignty. Second, we will try to contribute to the debate concerning competition between States and big tech to monopolize technological sovereignty considering international public law and ethics on AI.
In conclusion, sovereignty in general even newer forms of sovereignty are linked to States because the ultimate goal of these entities is peace and security where the ultimate goal of big tech is profit. In this context, the new world order urges international society to rethink the international public law and international institutions and to enhance the ethical framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fatima Roumate, Mohammed V University, International Institute of Scientific Research

Professor, President

References

Allen, G., & Chan, D. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and National Security. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/AI%20NatSec%20-%20final.pdf.

Baezner, M., & Robin, P. (2018). Trend Analysis: Cyber Sovereignty and Data Sovereignty. Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325335882_Trend_Analysis_Cyber_Sovereignty_and_Data_Sovereignty

Beaulac, S. (2003). The Social Power of Bodin’s ‘Sovereignty’ and International Law. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 4, 1–28. https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/1680337/Beaulac.pdf

Clinton, H. R. (2014). Hard choices. Simon & Schuster.

CTIA. (2018, July 10). The State of Wireless 2018. https://www.ctia.org/news/the-state-of-wireless-2018

Doernberg, D. L. (2010). Sovereignty in the age of Twitter, Villanova Law Review, 55(4), 833–862. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol55/iss4/2/

Edler, J., Blind, K., Frietsch, R., Kimpeler, S., Kroll, H., Lerch, C., Reiss, T., Roth, F., Schubert, T., Schuler, J., & Walz, R. (2020). Technology sovereignty: from demand to concept. Fraunhofer Institute for System and Innovation Research ISI. https://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/isi/dokumente/publikationen/technology_sovereignty.pdf

Indermit, G. (2020, January 17). Whoever leads in artificial intelligence in 2030 will rule the world until 2100, Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2020/01/17/whoever-leads-in-artificial-intelligence-in-2030-will-rule-the-world-until-2100/

International Federation of Robotics, (2020, September 24). IFR presents World Robotics Report 2020. http://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/record-2.7-million-robots-work-in-factories-around-the-globe

Jetter, M., & Leclerc, J.-M. (2019, November 7). IBM Policy Lab. IBM. www.ibm.com/blogs/policy/digital-sovereignty/

Kakisim, C. (2011). Rethinking the concept of state sovereignty and territory in the age of globalization in the light of “Colour revolutions” of the 2000s. http://www.wiscnetwork.org/porto2011/papers/WISC_2011-571.pdf

News Desk. (2020, February 12). Surfshark publishes map covering drone privacy laws around the world. Geospatial World. https://www.geospatialworld.net/news/surfshark-publishes-map-covering-drone-privacy-laws-around-the-world/

Sander, A., & Wolfgang, M. (2014, August 27). The Rise of Robotics. Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2014/business-unit-strategy-innovation-rise-of-robotics

Schmitt, M. N. (Ed.). (2013). The Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139169288

Stober, E. (2018, September 7). U.S. Military Announces $2 Billion Investment in Artificial Intelligence. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/4435519/us-military-artificial-intelligence-investment/

Surfshark. (2020, January 18). License to fly: Drone privacy laws.

The Federal Government. (2019, November 26). Speech by Federal Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel opening the 14th Annual Meeting of the Internet Governance Forum in Berlin on 26 November 2019. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/news/speech-by-federal-chancellor-dr-angela-merkel-opening-the-14th-annual-meeting-of-the-internet-governance-forum-in-berlin-on-26-november-2019-1701494

Touil, E. (2014). Relations Internationales. Vuibert.

Truchet, D. (2010). Le droit public. Que sais-je?

UNESCO, (2020). Toward a draft text of a recommendation on the ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Working document, UNESDOC. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373199

Valero, J. (2020, February 14). LEAK: Commission outlines plan to create single EU data space by 2030. EURACTIV. www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/leak-commission-outlines-plan-to-create-single-eu-data-space-by-2030/

Wood, Th. (2021, January 28). Global Stars: The most innovative Countries, Ranked by Income Group. Visual Capitalist. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/national-innovation-the-most-innovative-countries-by-income/

Xinhua. (2016, November 17). President Xi stresses int'l cooperation in cyberspace governance. World Internet Conference. www.wuzhenwic.org/2016-11/17/c_61495.htm

Published
2021-12-31
How to Cite
RoumateF. (2021). Ethics on AI and Technological Sovereignty. Communications. Media. Design, 6(4), 139-151. Retrieved from https://cmd-journal.hse.ru/article/view/13766
Section
Scientific Articles