Percolation Model of Communication with the Mechanism of the Selective Transmission of Information (Explanation of the Advertising Deafness Phenomenon)

  • Evgenii Viktorovich Garin LLC "Orgraf"
Keywords: advertising deafness, social graph, numerical characteristics of graphs, control signal, control theory

Abstract

This work is a continuation of the authors' work on the problems of modeling the structure of society using graph theory methods and constructing an explanatory model of the properties of information dissemination. In previous works, it was experimentally proved that the social graph has a strict orientation of the direction of information dissemination (Garin, Meshcheryakov, 2015). In the process of dissemination, information sequentially passes through a number of shares of the social graph, characterized by percolation (leakage) indicators (Garin, Meshcheryakov, 2017): properties of the loss of a part of information transmission channels at each stage in the information transmission chain, restoration of the throughput of the incoming information transmission channel by the receiver, total the throughput of the incoming information transmission channel by the receiver or its selectivity. The last of the listed properties of percolation has long been known as advertising deafness. This work is devoted to the construction of a communication model with a mechanism for the selective transmission of information and an explanation of the occurrence of advertising deafness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Evgenii Viktorovich Garin , LLC "Orgraf"

Director

References

Выхрыстюк, М. С., Федотова, Д. Ю. (2015). Языковая специфика информационных рекламных объявлений газеты «Сибирский листок». В мире научных открытий, 69(9–1), 266–279.

Гарин, Е. В., Мещеряков, Р. В. (2015). Социальный граф общества. Известия высших учебных заведений. Социология. Экономика. Политика, (4), 11–14.

Гарин, Е. В., Мещеряков, Р. В. (2017). Модель управления социумом. Проблемы теории и практики управления, (1), 105–121.

Гарин, Е. В. (2018). Модель строения социума с обратной связью. С. Д. Галиуллина и др. (ред.), Мир Востока и Мир Запада: проблемы и перспективы. Сборник статей Международной научно-практической конференции, 25 апреля 2018 г. (сс. 150–153). Изд-во УГНТУ. http://staff.tiiame.uz/storage/users/434/articles/F4fLBdiQcBol3E9DF3M6E3LcCMq1NgmAPidX7Csh.pdf

Каледина, М. А. (2016). Развитие рынка и технологий интернет-маркетинга. А. Р. Муратова и др. (ред.), Материалы Международной научно-практической конференции «Проблемы и перспективы формирования маркетинговых стратегий в условиях нестабильных рынков» (сс. 220–224). Кубанский государственный университет.

Корженко, А. А., Петрушечкина, В. В. (2014). Анализ распространения коммуникации в социальных сетях: модель Шеннона-Уивера и модель де Флера. Международная научно-практическая конференция «Ценности и интересы современного общества» (сс. 86–91). МЭСИ.

Лассуэлл, Г. Д. (2006). Язык власти. Политическая лингвистика, (20), 264–279.

Луман, Н. (1995). Что такое коммуникация? Социологический журнал, (3), 114–124.

Barnes, N. G., Lescault, A. M. (2013). Millennials drive social commerce: Turning their likes, follows or pins into a sale. University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Center for Marketing Research website. http://www.umassd.edu/cmr/

Berger, C. R. (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action. Erlbaum.

Berlo, D. (1960). The process of communication: an introduction to theory and practice. Holt, Reinhart and Winston.

Bitzer, L. (1968). The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1(1), 1–14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40236733?refreqid=excelsior%3A8081837c8de9df10de84df32f86be0c1&seq=1

Casmir, R. L. (Ed.). (1994). Building communication theories: A social cultural approach. Erlbaum.

Cherry, C. (1966). On human communication: A review, a survey, and a criticism (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Cobley, P. (Ed.). (1996). The communication theory reader. Routledge.

Craig, R. T. (1996). Practical theory: A reply to Sandelands. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 26(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1996.tb00286.x

Dance, F. E. X. (1970). The «concept» of communication. Journal of Communication, 20(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00877.x

Lasswell, H. D. (1949). The Analysis of Political Behavior: An Empirical Approach. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Maquail, D., Windahl, S. (1993). Communication Models for the Study of Mass Communication (2nd ed.). Longman.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.

Milgram, S. (1967). The Small World Problem. Psychology Today, 1(1), 61–67. http://files.diario-de-bordo-redes-conecti.webnode.com/200000013-211982212c/AN%20EXPERIMENTAL%20STUDY%20by%20Travers%20and%20Milgram.pdf

Nielsen, J. (1997, August 31). Why Advertising Doesn't Work on the Web. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-advertising-doesnt-work-on-the-web/

Peters, J. D. (1989). John Locke, the individual, and the origin of communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 75(4), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638909383886

Taylor, J. R. (1993). Rethinking the theory of organizational communication: How to read an organization. Ablex.

Swift, A. (2014, June 23). Americans Say Social Media Have Little Sway on Purchases. Gallup news. http://news.gallup.com/poll/171785/americans-say-social-media-little-effect-buying-decisions.aspx

Watts, D. J. (2003). Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. Norton.

Published
2021-03-31
How to Cite
Garin E. V. (2021). Percolation Model of Communication with the Mechanism of the Selective Transmission of Information (Explanation of the Advertising Deafness Phenomenon). Communications. Media. Design, 6(1), 39-63. Retrieved from https://cmd-journal.hse.ru/article/view/12231
Section
Scientific Articles