The Use and the Functioning of the Political Slang in the Media Communicative Space of the USA

  • Alexey Yuryevich Malafeev National Research University Higher School of Economics
  • Natalia Vladimirovna Makarova National Research University Higher School of Economics
Keywords: slang, media discourse, political discourse

Abstract

The division between Republicans and Democrats on fundamental political values reached record levels. The “they” against “us” politics is exploiting this division through racial, cultural and economic polarization within the American electorate, thus eliminating social class differences, which previously were vital for European and the U.S. partisanship politics. The start of 2016 U.S. election campaign has served as a catalyst of intense partisan animosity between GOP and DNC. Sharp political polarization on certain issues can also be manifested though usage of emotional and expressive vocabulary, as well as profanity and obscenity against opposing party members (ex. trumptard, hitlary, snowflake). This article tries to tackle the issue of context usage and function of American political slang within media of the United States. This paper also deals with the hypothesis of domination of identification and expressive slang functions within American political media discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alexey Yuryevich Malafeev, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor at the National Research University Higher School of Economics 

Natalia Vladimirovna Makarova , National Research University Higher School of Economics

Student of the Doctoral Programme 'Linguistics and Literary Studies' at the National Research University Higher School of Economics 

References

Abramowitz, A., Saunders, K. (2008). Is Polarization a Myth? [Electronic version]. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542-555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080493

Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans Without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion. [Electronic version]. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408-446. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010098

Berscheid, E. (1966). Opinion Change and Communicator-Communicatee Similarity and Dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(6), 670–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021193

DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized? [Electronic version]. American Journal of Sociology. 102(3), 690–755. https://doi.org/10.1086/230995

Dumas, B. K., Lighter, J. (1978). Is Slang a word for linguists? American Speech, 53(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/455336

Habermas, J. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x

Joseph, J. E. (2006). Language and Politics. University Press.

Khoo, J. (2017). Code Words in Political Discourse. [Electronic version]. Philosophical Topics, 45 (2), 33-64. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics201745213

Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

McCarty, N., Poole, K.T. & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Mendelberg, T. (2001). The Race Card: Campaign Strategy. Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton University Press.

Ranney, A. (1990). Broadcasting, Narrowcasting and Politics. In A. S. King (Ed.), The New American Political System (2nd ed.), (pp. 175–202). AEI Press.

Safire, W. (2008). Safire's Political Dictionary. Oxford University Press.

Sigelman, L., Sigelman, C. K. (1982). Sexism, Racism, and Ageism in Voting Behavior: An Experimental Analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(4), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033922

Stanley, J. (2015). How Propaganda Works. Princeton University Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton University Press.

Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In S. Worchel, W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp 7–24). Nelson-Hall.

Winter, N. (2010). Masculine Republicans and Feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ Explicit and Implicit Images of the Political Parties. Political Behavior, 32(4), 587–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z

Иванова Г. Р. (1990). Функции сленга в речевой деятельности американских студентов. Когнитивные и коммуникативные аспекты английской лексики. МГЛУ.

Лаптева Ю. В. (2012). Функции молодежного сленга (на материале французского языка). Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Лингвистика, 1, 158–161. https://www.vestnik-mgou.ru/Articles/Doc/1689

Published
2020-12-09
How to Cite
MalafeevA. Y., & Makarova N. V. (2020). The Use and the Functioning of the Political Slang in the Media Communicative Space of the USA. Communications. Media. Design, 5(3), 23-42. Retrieved from https://cmd-journal.hse.ru/article/view/11653
Section
Scientific Articles