Mechanisms of Advanced International Psychological Security in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

  • Fatima Roumate International Institute for Scientific Research
Keywords: artificial intelligence, autonomous weapon system, international law, international humanitarian law

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) influences all branches of international law, including economic and health law but also humanitarian and human rights law. Nevertheless, the most important challenges imposed by the malicious use of AI (MUAI) are not limited to the modernization of some fundamental principles of international law. This paper addresses mechanisms of advanced international psychological security in the age of AI. Three specific mechanisms are discussed in this study. A conclusion in this paper is that optimal actions are needed because AI is strengthening the role of transnational corporations in international society at the expense of the role of governments and states. While companies’ investments in AI are motivated purely by economic profits, states are left with the responsibility of guaranteeing international psychological security. Rethinking global systems has thus become an obligation rather than a choice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fatima Roumate, International Institute for Scientific Research

PhD, President

References

Abhivardhan (2018). The wider realm to artificial intelligence in international law. Proceedings CAIRA-2018. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3172280

Access Now (2018). Human Rights in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. https://www.accessnow.org/cms/assets/uploads/2018/11/AI-and-Human-Rights.pdf

African Union (2019, October 26). African digital transformation strategy, and African Union communication and advocacy strategy among major AU initiatives in the final declaration of STCCICT3. https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20191026/african-digital-transformation-strategy-and-african-union-communication-and

AI HELEG (2018, December 18). DRAFT Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on AI. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/draft-ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai

Anderson, K., & Waxman, M. (2013). Law and ethics for autonomous weapon systems: Why a ban won’t work and how the laws of war can. The Hoover Institution Jean Perkins Task Force on National Security & Law Essay Series. https://media.hoover.org/sites/default/files/documents/Anderson-Waxman_LawAndEthics_r2_FINAL.pdf

Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., Dafoe, A., Scharre, P., Zeitzoff, T., Filar, B., Anderson, H., Roff, H., Allen, G. C., Steinhardt, J., Flynn, hÉigeartaigh, S. Ó., Beard, S., Belfield, Farquhar, S.,…, & Amodei, D. (2018, February). The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation, February 2018. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1802/1802.07228.pdf

Burri, T. (2017). International law and artificial intelligence. In A. von Andreas, K. von der Decken, & M. Matz-Lück (Eds.) German Yearbook of International Law 2017, Vol. 60. Duncker & Humblot (pp. 91–108).

Cohen, N. (2011, February 20). Egyptians Were Unplugged, and Uncowed. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/21/business/media/21link.html

Council of Europe (2019, September 11). 1353rd meeting, Ad hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI) https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016809737a1

Council of Europe (2001, November 11). Convention on Cybercrime (CETS No.185). https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/185

Council of Europe (2020, September 10). Chart of signatures and ratifications of Treaty 185, Convention on Cybercrime, Status as of 10/09/2020 https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/185/signatures

Еuropean Parliament, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, (2000/C 364/01) 18.12.2000 Official Journal of the European Communities, C 364/1. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf

European Union (2012, October 26). Consolidation version of the treaty on European Union, Official Journal of the European Union, C 326/17 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:2bf140bf-a3f8-4ab2-b506-fd71826e6da6.0023.02/DOC_1&format=PDF

G20 Insights (2010). G20 AI Principles. https://www.g20-insights.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/G20-Japan-AI-Principles.pdf

G7 (2018, June 9). Charlevoix Common Vision for the Future of Artificial Intelligence. http://www.g7.utoronto.ca/summit/2018charlevoix/ai-commitment.html

Goldstein, A. (2013). First things first: The pressing danger of crisis instability in U.S.-China relations. International Security, 37(4), 49–89. http://doi.org/f4tz

Greenberg, A. (2015, July 21). Hackers remotely kill a Jeep on the highway—with me in it. Wired. https://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway

Human Rights Watch (2012, November 19). Losing Humanity: The Case Against Killer Robots. https://www.hrw.org/report/2012/11/19/losing-humanity/case-against-killer-robots

Internet Rights & Principles Coalition (2019). The Charter of Human Rights and Principles for the Internet, Seventh Edition. https://internetrightsandprinciples.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/IRP_booklet_Eng_7ed_Nov2019.pdf

Leys, N. (2018). Autonomous weapon systems, and international crises. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 12(1), 48–73. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/SSQ/documents/Volume-12_Issue-1/Leys.pdf

OECD (2019, May 22). OECD principles on AI. http://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/

OECD (2020, February 27). OECD.AI Policy Observatory. https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/about-the-oecd-ai-policy-observatory.pdf

OECD (2020, April 23). OECD policy responses to coronavirus (COVID-19), using artificial intelligence to help combat COVID-19. http://oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/using-artificial-intelligence-to-help-combat-covid-19-ae4c5c21/

Pratt, G. A. (2015). Is a Cambrian explosion coming for robotics? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 51–60.

Seger, A. (2012, February 16). The Budapest Convention on cybercrime 10 years on: Lessons learnt or the web is a web. https://rm.coe.int/16802fa3e0

Smith, B. R. (2020, April 22). Trump’s top diplomat claims China not sharing Covid-19 sample with world scientists: Mike Pompeo also accuses China of waiting a month before reporting human-to-human spread. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/04/22/trumps-top-diplomat-claims-china-not-sharing-covid-19-sample

UNESCO (2019, March 21). Preliminary study on the technical and legal aspects relating to the desirability of a standard-setting instrument on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Extended Working Group on Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (AI) of the World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367422

United Nations (1977, June 8). Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), of 8 June 1977. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.34_AP-I-EN.pdf

World Health Organization (2020, May 28). Ethical considerations to guide the use of digital proximity tracking technologies for COVID-19 contact tracing. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Ethics_Contact_tracing_apps-2020.1

Xiao, Y. & Fan, Z. (2020, April 27). 10 technology trends to watch in the COVID-19 pandemic. World Economic Forum. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/10-technology-trends-coronavirus-covid19-pandemic-robotics-telehealth/

Published
2020-09-16
How to Cite
RoumateF. (2020). Mechanisms of Advanced International Psychological Security in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Communications. Media. Design, 5(1), 143-156. Retrieved from https://cmd-journal.hse.ru/article/view/11316
Section
Scientific Articles